The data · 6 min read

What 970,000 People Said About Kink

The largest survey of sexual interests ever run is not a clinical study — it is a self-selected online sample. It is still the most useful picture we have of how ordinary having a kink actually is, and it lines up with what a sex therapist hears all day.

Written and clinically reviewed by Vanessa Cushing, LPC, NCC, MS — AASECT-Certified Sex Therapist, licensed in Virginia & Florida. The Cushing Counseling team covers Virginia, DC, Maryland & Florida.

Two glazed ceramic vessels standing close together, casting overlapping shadows

The short answer

The Big Kink Survey, run by independent researcher Aella, has collected roughly 970,000 responses about sexual interests across 27 kink categories. In its published subsample, 98.8% of respondents reported at least one kink, with an average of about ten categories per person. It is a self-selected online sample rather than a random one, so those figures describe the people who took it — not a national rate. Even with that caveat, the direction is unambiguous: having kinks is ordinary, and having several is typical.

Book a free 15-minute consultation

If the question underneath your reading is “am I the only one,” a free 15-minute call is a quiet place to ask it.

What the survey is

Aella, an independent researcher who writes at Knowingless, built a long questionnaire about sexual interests and put it online. It went viral — largely through TikTok — and has since collected roughly 970,000 responses, which makes it the largest dataset of its kind that anyone has assembled.

In February 2026 she published a representative subsample of 15,503 responses as an open dataset on Zenodo, with a DOI so it can be cited. That is unusual and worth saying plainly: most people making claims about how common a sexual interest is will not show you their numbers.

  • Approximately 970,000 total responses collected.
  • 27 kink categories surveyed, alongside personality and demographic questions.
  • A 15,503-response representative subsample published openly (Zenodo DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18625249).
  • Not peer-reviewed, and not a random sample of any country's population.

The headline numbers

Two figures from the published subsample do most of the work, and both point the same way.

FindingReported figureHow to read it
Respondents reporting at least one kink98.8%Among people who chose to take a survey about kink. Read it as “essentially everyone who answered,” not as a population rate.
Average number of kink categories per personAbout 10 of 27Multiple interests is the norm, not the exception. A single tidy “my kink” is the unusual case.
Giving vs. receiving pain, by genderWomen reported higher interest in receiving; men in givingA group-average difference with enormous overlap. It predicts nothing about any individual.

What the data cannot tell you

This matters more than the percentages, and the researcher says it herself: the people who answered skewed young, female, liberal and non-cisgender. A self-selected online sample tells you about the people who selected themselves.

So the survey cannot give you a real prevalence rate for any specific interest in the general population, it cannot tell you what causes an interest, and it cannot tell you whether anything in it is healthy for a particular person. Nothing in a dataset settles a question about one life.

  • No random sampling, so no valid national prevalence figures.
  • Self-reported answers, with all the honesty and memory limits that carries.
  • Correlations only — nothing in it establishes cause.
  • It says nothing about consent, safety or context, which are the parts that actually matter clinically.

Why a sex therapist finds it useful anyway

Almost nobody arrives in therapy asking for statistics. They arrive asking a shame question wearing statistics as a costume: how common is this, how many people are like me, is this the strangest thing you have heard this week.

The honest clinical answer has always been that unusual-feeling interests are extremely common and that being into several things at once is typical. What this dataset adds is that the answer no longer has to rest on one clinician's caseload. Nearly a million people answered, and “only one kink” was the rare profile.

  • It reframes the question from “is this normal” to the one that matters: is this consensual, and is it costing you something.
  • It normalizes having many interests, which is what most clients quietly assume is the abnormal part.
  • It gives partners a reference point that is not a search-engine horror story.
Two glazed ceramic vessels standing close together, casting overlapping shadows

The question the numbers replace

In our sessions the useful line is not statistical. An interest is worth working on when it is non-consensual, when it involves someone who cannot consent, or when it has stopped feeling like a choice and is taking more of your life than you want to give it. Short of that, frequency is beside the point.

That is also why we do not spend sessions hunting for the event that “explains” a kink. Sometimes there is history worth understanding and sometimes there simply isn't. What we work on is shame, secrecy, disclosure and the cost of hiding — the parts that actually hurt.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Big Kink Survey a scientific study?

It is a large, openly published dataset collected by an independent researcher, not a peer-reviewed study with a random sample. Treat it as strong descriptive evidence about a very large group of self-selected respondents, not as a population prevalence estimate.

How many people have a kink?

In the survey's published subsample, 98.8% of respondents reported at least one kink — but everyone in that sample chose to take a survey about kink. No dataset currently gives a trustworthy figure for the general population. What is safe to say is that clinicians see unusual-feeling interests constantly, and that having several is ordinary.

What is the most common kink?

Rankings shift depending on how categories are defined and who answers, which is exactly why we are cautious about publishing a leaderboard. The more robust finding is the count: respondents averaged around ten of the 27 categories surveyed.

Does data like this mean my kink is fine?

It means it is not rare, which is usually the real question. Whether it is fine is a different test, and it is not about frequency: consent, capacity to consent, and whether the behavior still feels like a choice.

Can I read the dataset myself?

Yes. The representative subsample is published on Zenodo with a citable DOI, and the researcher writes about her methodology and demographics openly on her Substack. Both are linked in the resources below.

Keep reading

Also on this site

Clinical resources this page draws on

Next step

Not sure where to start? Take the free 6-question assessment, or book a 15-minute consultation.

Take the assessmentBook a consultation